Acervo
Applied AI Research: Verifiable Spanish Case Law Citations
Legal / Applied Research
|Ongoing — evaluation with law firms5
Judgments Read in Parallel
~3 min
From Brief to Draft
5/5
Citations Verified by ECLI
The Challenge
General-purpose AI assistants produce legal citations that sound right and do not exist: fabricated ECLI identifiers and doctrine no court ever issued. In 2023 a New York court sanctioned two lawyers for filing a brief with six cases invented by ChatGPT (Mata v. Avianca). For a lawyer, an invented citation is a professional risk, not a minor slip. Traditional legal databases are reliable but sit outside the assistant, and thin layers over a language model rarely guarantee that a source is official or that each firm's work stays isolated. The research question was concrete: can an AI system work with Spanish case law while checking every citation against the official source before it is used?
Our Approach
Acervo is an applied research program run by Quorax. We built a multi-agent system in which several specialized AI models share search, reading and verification tools, and connected it to the assistants lawyers already use (Perplexity, Claude and others) through the open MCP standard with OAuth 2.1. It works on case law and legislation published by the official sources (CENDOJ, the Constitutional Court and the consolidated legislation of the BOE). Verification comes first: the system only returns ECLIs that appear literally in the source, flags any citation it cannot verify as not citable, and can also check citations that come from a draft, a third party or another AI. It reads full judgments rather than excerpts, several at a time, and helps draft with them. Each firm works on its own isolated instance hosted in the EU (Frankfurt), under a GDPR Article 28 data processing agreement, with case names, notes and briefs kept inside the firm. The prototype is now being validated with law firms on real assignments through an evaluation access.
Key Deliverables
Tech Stack
Impact
In a sample assignment (a client's claim for mortgage arrangement costs), Acervo opened five Supreme Court judgments in parallel, read them in full, verified that each ECLI exists in the official source and drafted the legal grounds in about three minutes, inside Perplexity, saving the draft to the firm's private matter. All five citations were verified. When given a made-up ECLI, it rejected it as not verified and not citable. Acervo does not provide legal advice: it finds, verifies and organizes, and every citation carries its official reference so the lawyer can check it in context before using it. What participating firms observe during the evaluation guides the next phase of the research. More at acervo.quorax.ai.
Interested in similar results?
Let's talk about your project and how we can help.